data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/add02/add02dd2c91cf2726bf5e03d8a582d585a81169a" alt=""
By the end of the second summer I had ripped out everything
the previous owner had planted in my yard (Beach theme? SO overdone here) and
replaced them with all the delightful stuff I’d found. Exciting colors, amazing
textures and anything that struck my fancy. If I thought it was cool or pretty,
I bought it and stuck it in the dirt around my house.
By the time the fourth summer rolled around it occurred to
me my yard looked like a floral experiment: exotic tropical flowers, whimsical wild
field flowers, traditional English garden flowers: all crammed into a 20 foot
by 50 foot space. It kinda worked. If nothing else it was a lot to take in and
sometimes people would slow down when they drove by my house, just to look. I
was proud of it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72897/728971f48f23b5c71650a0a1dc26dddc37606eee" alt=""
And I
realized I had goals for my yard that I hadn’t considered when I started
decorating it. I wanted beauty, of course. But I also wanted something manageable
(something it had gone WAY beyond being). And most of all, I wanted a yard that
attracted butterflies and humming birds.
Instead I had plants that needed a ton of watering right next
to flowers that die with over-watering. I had heedlessly planted bulbs that
need a frost each winter, next to hothouse succulents that die with even mildly
chilly temperatures. There were flowering vines of all kinds growing everywhere
that required clipping every couple days. Trumpet flowers pressing over climbing
roses, each reaching for the sky in competition for the sun.
But worst of all I had wasps, hornets and flies stubbornly
making their home in my yard all year long. In addition to my being allergic to
their stingers, I wasn’t getting many of the butterflies I had hoped for and
not a single hummingbird.
I knew I had made mistakes, but I wasn’t sure how to get my
desired results.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/531b4/531b47414e4dfcb15a6891a354f1c89614c3bbed" alt=""
I had to accept that nature would do its thing whether I
thought it was fair or not. But, if I followed the rules of attraction for bugs
I could get at least mostly what I wanted and avoid a messy, half-baked yard
that needed constant upkeep. Once I accepted this method, it was a simple thing
to choose my favorites of flowers that attract the bugs I like and let go of
the plants that attracted the bugs I didn’t like. By the following summer, my
yard had radically changed once again; this time to the fairy garden feel I
wanted.
Including attracting
the right mate.
Aside from the random celebrity that fits a somewhat different mold,
I have come to realize I have a guy type. There is a collection of features
that I have been consistently attracted to since I was a little girl watching Western movies with my grandpa. Dark haired, light colored eyes, oval
face, straight nose, fuller lips with a lean, muscular build. Skin can be a
shade lighter or darker but those other traits remain constant. This is my
butterfly and hummingbird garden combination in a man.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc0be/cc0be0aee85245bd76acc968c0108177ccbd35e3" alt=""
One day about a year ago while kneeling in the dirt admiring my now successful garden, it occurred to me that I might need to evaluate what I was or was not doing to attract that kind of guy, just like I was now planting the right flowers to attract the right creatures.
Unfortunately there wasn’t an easy Google search with a list
of proven things to tell me how to catch a man like that. But I decided I could
look at other women who were attracting them and see what they had going for
them. Any time I saw a guy who had my favorite feature package, I would see if
he had a woman and size her up.
It turns out the height and body size of the women catching
the men I like, isn’t too far off what I already am. Close to average female
height, a slender somewhat athletic build, with at least average attractiveness.
Their face shapes and eye colors all varied quite a bit and their skin tone
could also be a shade lighter or darker.
From what I could see the only consistent factor was their
hair. Curly or straight, long or short, the length and texture was less important
that the color. The guys I like: like blondes. My hair is brown.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c647f/c647ffcc78c2cf40a28597e84b8d508fd33f2dad" alt=""
Now I could have gotten mad. I could have fought it and decided that any man who needed me to color my hair to love me, wasn't worthy of my love.
But, didn't I have a preferred type too? Wasn't I guilty of overlooking certain blonde or red haired guys because a dark haired guy next to him caught my eye first? Did I consider myself a hypocrite or was I just attracted to what I liked? Could I blame anyone else for feeling the same way?
I decided I could shake my fist at the waspy women invading the garden I wanted for myself, complaining it's unjust. Or I could acknowledge that attraction is attraction- my opinions be dammed- and just become the delectable nectar that would bring me the results I wanted.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6fe4/d6fe45a09943c15c5b2998f229c8136f2ddbc140" alt=""
Just for an extra test I threw up a couple slightly younger pictures of
myself, more toned and with blonder tresses on my online dating profiles. In the hours and days that followed, in poured the “likes”
and messages from guys who fit my boyfriend-worthy bill.
I was stunned. And I then I knocked out an hour long workout
and made an appointment to get my hair colored. Somehow I was in denial. Was there a formula for attracting my preferred man, just like a formula for my ideal garden?
This was my garden card of attraction rules: Be fitter and be blonder? Was it really that easy? Was this what it was to work with biological urges, instead of fight them and insist that rules were made to be broken and a man should love me for my personality and heart and not my hair color or hip-to-waist ratio? I believe so.
This was my garden card of attraction rules: Be fitter and be blonder? Was it really that easy? Was this what it was to work with biological urges, instead of fight them and insist that rules were made to be broken and a man should love me for my personality and heart and not my hair color or hip-to-waist ratio? I believe so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34fbe/34fbe08438531fc215fe009012768d5e72db908d" alt=""
But I will say that if a little
effort and sacrifice gets me the joy I want for a lovely garden and a partner
who’s as attracted to me as I am to them- isn’t that worth it?
3 comments:
Do you think it was the change to blonde or being more fit that got you more attention from guys you like? The scientist in me wants you to repeat this experiment with only one variable in play at a time:)
It is definitely the hair color. The fitness level was barely a 5 pound difference. It is literally a difference between my wearing a size 2 or a size 3, (an inch one way or another in my waist and bust line) both sizes are still considered XS in all clothing stores. I added the fitness aspect to the article for a couple reasons. 1. I know when I regularly work out I dress and walk with more confidence even if my body size hasn't changed and even with brown hair that gets me more attention 2. I am constantly encouraging other women to be more mindful of their fitness level. A dramatic body size change would certainly account for more attention but not in this case. If I were a plus sized girl, staying a plus sized girl and just changing my hair color wouldn't make me significantly more appealing. However all things being equal with body size/ type, age, facial attractivness, in exteriments people have found that girls wearing blond wigs (and nothing else different about them) got more help and attention than when they took the wig off and had brunette hair. I've seen this in a number of YouTube video experiments. While people like to say that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" time again we see the same patterns of preference. Younger, fitter, light skinned girls with symmetrical facial features and medium to long blonde hair are the top pick in nearly every culture, race and demographic. I was just surprised to realize I've actually experience it first hand.
That's interesting. I wonder why that is. Maybe it has something to do with how there are very few natural blondes like you said. Maybe they are just tricking us into thinking they are a rare and valuable commodity. I'd like to think I don't have a "type" at least outwardly but maybe its in my subconscious. When I was dating, it was a mixture of darker and lighter hair colors, but with more on the darker side. I feel better now that I'm not the only one who has done social experiments to see what traits get more hits online. Sadly, the trait that had the most dramatic effect on number of visitors and messages received was something a guy can't change: height. 6' seems to be the sweet spot that women are looking for, at least by the number of "likes" and messages I received. I even put up some fake salaries but that didn't have any effect surprisingly to me. I think it's pretty lame to post your salary on a dating website, but I thought maybe some women would like it. I was relieved no one seemed to be impressed by that.
Post a Comment